Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9174F is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz also around 12% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 32% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9174F uses around 44% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 6 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 9174F | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9174F | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.4 GHz | Up to 4.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 32 (Threads: 64) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 2,560KB, L2: 40.0MB, L3: 48MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 205W | 320W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $58.40 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2022 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 17.5 | 24.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2268(-31.6%) | 3318(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 48648(-12.3%) | 55485(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | 48,648 | |
AMD EPYC 9174F | 55,485 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | 17.5 | |
AMD EPYC 9174F | 24.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | 2,268 | |
AMD EPYC 9174F | 3,318 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | AMD EPYC 9174F | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 205W | 320W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.41 | 0.64 |
Running cost per day | $0.102 | $0.160 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 149.6 | 233.6 |
Running cost per year | $37.41 | $58.40 |