Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7D12 is newer than Intel Xeon W-3345 @ 3.00GHz, while Intel Xeon W-3345 @ 3.00GHz is around 7% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 24% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7D12 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 21 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD EPYC 7D12 | |
2: Intel Xeon W-3345 @ 3.00GHz | |
×AMD EPYC 7D12 | ×Intel Xeon W-3345 @ 3.00GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | FCLGA4189 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 1.1 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.0 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 32 (Threads: 64) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 128MB | L1: 1,920KB, L2: 30.0MB, L3: 36MB | |
TDP | 85W | 250W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $15.51 | $45.63 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2022 | Q3 2022 | |
# of Samples | 18 | 3 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 18.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1899(-23.7%) | 2489(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 42900(-6.8%) | 46019(0.0%) |
AMD EPYC 7D12 | 42,900 | |
Intel Xeon W-3345 @ 3.00GHz | 46,019 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7D12 | NA | |
Intel Xeon W-3345 @ 3.00GHz | 18.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7D12 | 1,899 | |
Intel Xeon W-3345 @ 3.00GHz | 2,489 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7D12 | Intel Xeon W-3345 @ 3.00GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 85W | 250W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.17 | 0.50 |
Running cost per day | $0.043 | $0.125 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 62.1 | 182.5 |
Running cost per year | $15.51 | $45.63 |