Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Hygon C86 3250 8-core is newer than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is around 17% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 27% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 6177 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Hygon C86 3250 8-core | |
2: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
×Hygon C86 3250 8-core | ×AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$147 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | AM4 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | Up to 4.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 6 (Threads: 12) | |
Cache | L1: 768KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 32MB | L1: 576KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 16MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $17.34 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2023 | Q2 2018 | |
# of Samples | 5 | 6172 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 94.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1741(-26.9%) | 2382(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 11476(-17.4%) | 13896(0.0%) |
Hygon C86 3250 8-core | 11,476 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | 13,896 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Hygon C86 3250 8-core | NA | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | 94.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Hygon C86 3250 8-core | 1,741 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | 2,382 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Hygon C86 3250 8-core | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | 0.19 |
Running cost per day | NA | $0.048 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | 69.3 |
Running cost per year | NA | $17.34 |