Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9375F is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y also around 37% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 29% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9375F uses around 35% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 7 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y | |
2: AMD EPYC 9375F | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y | ×AMD EPYC 9375F | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.1 GHz | Up to 4.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 32 (Threads: 64) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 2,560KB, L2: 64.0MB, L3: 60MB | L1: 2,560KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 225W | 320W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $41.06 | $58.40 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2023 | Q1 2025 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 3 | |
CPU Value | 16.9 | 18.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2686(-28.6%) | 3762(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 60449(-36.9%) | 95768(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y | 60,449 | |
AMD EPYC 9375F | 95,768 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y | 16.9 | |
AMD EPYC 9375F | 18.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y | 2,686 | |
AMD EPYC 9375F | 3,762 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y | AMD EPYC 9375F | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 225W | 320W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.45 | 0.64 |
Running cost per day | $0.113 | $0.160 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 164.3 | 233.6 |
Running cost per year | $41.06 | $58.40 |