Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz is newer than Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz, while Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz is around 23% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing and is significantly faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz uses around 32% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 18 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
×Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz | ×Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1493 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 1.5 GHz | 1.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | Up to 2.6 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 4MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 4MB | |
TDP | 9W | 6.5W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $1.64 | $1.10 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors | Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors | |
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2023 | Q4 2022 | |
# of Samples | 3 | 15 | |
CPU Value | 28.1 | 37.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 608(-55.3%) | 1360(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1544(-22.6%) | 1995(0.0%) |
Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz | 1,544 | |
Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz | 1,995 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz | 28.1 | |
Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz | 37.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz | 608 | |
Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz | 1,360 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Atom x6414RE @ 1.50GHz | Intel Celeron N6210 @ 1.20GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 9W | 6.5W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |