Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon w5-3435X is newer than AMD EPYC 9124, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Xeon w5-3435X is around 22% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon w5-3435X uses around 47% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 75 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon w5-3435X | |
2: AMD EPYC 9124 | |
×Intel Xeon w5-3435X | ×AMD EPYC 9124 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$1230.63 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.1 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.7 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 32) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 45MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 64MB | |
TDP | 324W | 200W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $59.13 | $36.50 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2023 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 51 | 24 | |
CPU Value | 25.3 | 35.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 3460(0.0%) | 2690(-22.3%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 45883(0.0%) | 43681(-4.8%) |
Intel Xeon w5-3435X | 45,883 | |
AMD EPYC 9124 | 43,681 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon w5-3435X | 25.3 | |
AMD EPYC 9124 | 35.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon w5-3435X | 3,460 | |
AMD EPYC 9124 | 2,690 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon w5-3435X | AMD EPYC 9124 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 324W | 200W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.65 | 0.40 |
Running cost per day | $0.162 | $0.100 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 236.5 | 146.0 |
Running cost per year | $59.13 | $36.50 |