Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Samsung "Exynos 9610" is newer than Intel Celeron 7305E also around 31% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 27% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 5 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Celeron 7305E | ×Samsung "Exynos 9610" | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1744 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 1.0 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | NA2 | |
# of Physical Cores | 5 (Threads: 5) | 8 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 464KB, L2: 3.3MB, L3: 8MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 15W | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | $2.74 | NA | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel Processors | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2023 | Q1 2024 | |
# of Samples | 3 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 20.5 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 735(-27.4%) | 1012(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2191(-30.8%) | 3168(0.0%) |
Intel Celeron 7305E | 2,191 | |
Samsung "Exynos 9610" | 3,168 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron 7305E | 20.5 | |
Samsung "Exynos 9610" | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron 7305E | 735 | |
Samsung "Exynos 9610" | 1,012 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron 7305E | Samsung "Exynos 9610" | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 15W | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |