Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz is newer than AMD Opteron 4280 also around 12% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but AMD Opteron 4280 is around 16% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 4 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz | |
2: AMD Opteron 4280 | |
×Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz | ×AMD Opteron 4280 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$261.62 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1310 | Socket C32 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.1 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 8) | 8 (in 4 physical modules) | |
Cache | NA2 | L1: 640KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 26W | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $4.75 | $17.34 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2024 | Q1 2014 | |
# of Samples | 3 | 1 | |
CPU Value | 22.8 | 17.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 955(-16.3%) | 1141(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 5100(0.0%) | 4504(-11.7%) |
Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz | 5,100 | |
AMD Opteron 4280 | 4,504 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz | 22.8 | |
AMD Opteron 4280 | 17.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz | 955 | |
AMD Opteron 4280 | 1,141 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz | AMD Opteron 4280 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 26W | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.05 | 0.19 |
Running cost per day | $0.013 | $0.048 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 19.0 | 69.3 |
Running cost per year | $4.75 | $17.34 |