Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Athlon 64 3000+ is newer than Intel Core Duo T2050 @ 1.60GHz, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, AMD Athlon 64 3000+ is around 19% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core Duo T2050 @ 1.60GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 463 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Core Duo T2050 @ 1.60GHz | |
2: AMD Athlon 64 3000+ | |
×Intel Core Duo T2050 @ 1.60GHz | ×AMD Athlon 64 3000+ | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | PGA478 | Socket 754 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 1.6 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 1 (Threads: 1) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, | |
TDP | 31W | 89W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $5.66 | $16.24 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2008 | Q4 2008 | |
# of Samples | 134 | 329 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 16.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 4983(-19.1%) | 6153(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 333(-0.3%) | 334(0.0%) |
Intel Core Duo T2050 @ 1.60GHz | 333 | |
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ | 334 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Duo T2050 @ 1.60GHz | NA | |
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ | 16.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Duo T2050 @ 1.60GHz | 498 | |
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ | 615 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Duo T2050 @ 1.60GHz | AMD Athlon 64 3000+ | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 31W | 89W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.06 | 0.18 |
Running cost per day | $0.015 | $0.044 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 22.6 | 65.0 |
Running cost per year | $5.66 | $16.24 |