Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while Intel Xeon E5-4628L v4 @ 1.80GHz is around 24% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 45% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 8 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
×Intel Xeon E5-4628L v4 @ 1.80GHz | ×ARM HUAWEI,Kunpeng 920 24 Core 2600 MHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 1.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.2 GHz | NA2 | |
# of Physical Cores | 14 (Threads: 28) | 24 (Threads: 24) | |
Cache | L1: 2KB, L2: 0.0MB, L3: 0MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 75W | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | $13.69 | NA | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2024 | Q2 2024 | |
# of Samples | 7 | 1 | |
CPU Value | 4.9 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1327(0.0%) | 733(-44.8%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 12461(0.0%) | 9496(-23.8%) |
Intel Xeon E5-4628L v4 @ 1.80GHz | 12,461 | |
ARM HUAWEI,Kunpeng 920 24 Core 2600 MHz | 9,496 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Xeon E5-4628L v4 @ 1.80GHz | 4.9 | |
ARM HUAWEI,Kunpeng 920 24 Core 2600 MHz | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Xeon E5-4628L v4 @ 1.80GHz | 1,327 | |
ARM HUAWEI,Kunpeng 920 24 Core 2600 MHz | 733 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Xeon E5-4628L v4 @ 1.80GHz | ARM HUAWEI,Kunpeng 920 24 Core 2600 MHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 75W | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |