Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, AMD EPYC 4564P is around 35% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H uses around 45% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 25 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H | |
2: AMD EPYC 4564P | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H | ×AMD EPYC 4564P | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4677 | AM5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.4 GHz | Up to 5.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 32 (Threads: 64) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | NA2 | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 64MB | |
TDP | 270W | 170W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $49.28 | $31.03 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2024 | Q2 2024 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 23 | |
CPU Value | 9.5 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2831(-35.4%) | 4382(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 62347(-4.7%) | 65394(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H | 62,347 | |
AMD EPYC 4564P | 65,394 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H | 9.5 | |
AMD EPYC 4564P | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H | 2,831 | |
AMD EPYC 4564P | 4,382 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H | AMD EPYC 4564P | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 270W | 170W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.54 | 0.34 |
Running cost per day | $0.135 | $0.085 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 197.1 | 124.1 |
Running cost per year | $49.28 | $31.03 |