Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The BCM2712 is newer than Intel Atom x6427FE @ 1.90GHz, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, BCM2712 is around 31% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 7 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×BCM2712 | ×Intel Atom x6427FE @ 1.90GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | FCBGA1493 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | NA2 | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 4MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 12W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $2.19 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2024 | Q3 2023 | |
# of Samples | 6 | 1 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 38.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1464(0.0%) | 1016(-30.6%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3284(0.0%) | 3196(-2.7%) |
BCM2712 | 3,284 | |
Intel Atom x6427FE @ 1.90GHz | 3,196 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
BCM2712 | NA | |
Intel Atom x6427FE @ 1.90GHz | 38.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
BCM2712 | 1,464 | |
Intel Atom x6427FE @ 1.90GHz | 1,016 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
BCM2712 | Intel Atom x6427FE @ 1.90GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 12W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |