Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i3-13100TE is newer than Samsung s5e8845 and is around 14% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core i3-13100TE is around -23% slower in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 73 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Core i3-13100TE | |
2: Samsung s5e8845 | |
×Intel Core i3-13100TE | ×Samsung s5e8845 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1700 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.1 GHz | NA2 | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 8) | 8 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 320KB, L2: 5.0MB, L3: 12MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 35W | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | NA | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2024 | Q1 2024 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 72 | |
CPU Value | 58.8 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1805(-22.7%) | 2334(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 8057(0.0%) | 7086(-12.1%) |
Intel Core i3-13100TE | 8,057 | |
Samsung s5e8845 | 7,086 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i3-13100TE | 58.8 | |
Samsung s5e8845 | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i3-13100TE | 1,805 | |
Samsung s5e8845 | 2,334 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i3-13100TE | Samsung s5e8845 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.07 | NA |
Running cost per day | $0.018 | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 25.6 | NA |
Running cost per year | $6.39 | NA |