Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while Intel Xeon w9-3595X is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 36% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon Gold 5320H @ 2.40GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 14 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 5320H @ 2.40GHz | ×Intel Xeon w9-3595X | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | FCLGA4677 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.2 GHz | Up to 4.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 20 (Threads: 40) | 60 (Threads: 120) | |
Cache | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 28MB | L1: 2KB, L2: 0.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 150W | 385W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $70.26 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2024 | Q3 2024 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 12 | |
CPU Value | 20.4 | 17.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2428(-36.5%) | 3822(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 31718(-68.8%) | 101511(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 5320H @ 2.40GHz | 31,718 | |
Intel Xeon w9-3595X | 101,511 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5320H @ 2.40GHz | 20.4 | |
Intel Xeon w9-3595X | 17.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5320H @ 2.40GHz | 2,428 | |
Intel Xeon w9-3595X | 3,822 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5320H @ 2.40GHz | Intel Xeon w9-3595X | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 150W | 385W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |