Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while Intel Xeon W-3225 @ 3.70GHz is around 10% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing and is significantly faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon W-3225 @ 3.70GHz uses around 42% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 4 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2 @ 1.90GHz | ×Intel Xeon W-3225 @ 3.70GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011 | FCLGA3647 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 1.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 4.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 6 (Threads: 12) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 3,072KB, L2: 192.0MB, L3: 16MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 17MB | |
TDP | 105W | 160W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $19.16 | $29.20 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2024 | Q4 2024 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 3 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 13.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1006(-57.3%) | 2357(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 16471(-9.7%) | 18251(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2 @ 1.90GHz | 16,471 | |
Intel Xeon W-3225 @ 3.70GHz | 18,251 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2 @ 1.90GHz | NA | |
Intel Xeon W-3225 @ 3.70GHz | 13.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2 @ 1.90GHz | 1,006 | |
Intel Xeon W-3225 @ 3.70GHz | 2,357 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E7-4809 v2 @ 1.90GHz | Intel Xeon W-3225 @ 3.70GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 105W | 160W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |