Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while AMD EPYC 9355P is around 39% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 20% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9355P uses around 11% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 9 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 6542Y | |
2: AMD EPYC 9355P | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6542Y | ×AMD EPYC 9355P | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.1 GHz | Up to 4.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 2KB, L2: 0.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 2,560KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 250W | 280W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $45.63 | $51.10 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2024 | Q1 2025 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 7 | |
CPU Value | 20.5 | 32.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2975(-20.3%) | 3735(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 59047(-39.3%) | 97214(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6542Y | 59,047 | |
AMD EPYC 9355P | 97,214 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6542Y | 20.5 | |
AMD EPYC 9355P | 32.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6542Y | 2,975 | |
AMD EPYC 9355P | 3,735 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6542Y | AMD EPYC 9355P | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 250W | 280W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.50 | 0.56 |
Running cost per day | $0.125 | $0.140 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 182.5 | 204.4 |
Running cost per year | $45.63 | $51.10 |