Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon w7-3565X is newer than AMD EPYC 9354, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Xeon w7-3565X is around 29% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon w7-3565X uses around 18% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 11 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon w7-3565X | |
2: AMD EPYC 9354 | |
×Intel Xeon w7-3565X | ×AMD EPYC 9354 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$3149.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.8 GHz | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 32 (Threads: 64) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 2,560KB, L2: 64.0MB, L3: 83MB | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 2,048MB | |
TDP | 335W | 280W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $61.14 | $51.10 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2024 | Q3 2023 | |
# of Samples | 5 | 6 | |
CPU Value | 27.3 | 22.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 3592(0.0%) | 2538(-29.3%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 73318(0.0%) | 71452(-2.5%) |
Intel Xeon w7-3565X | 73,318 | |
AMD EPYC 9354 | 71,452 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon w7-3565X | 27.3 | |
AMD EPYC 9354 | 22.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon w7-3565X | 3,592 | |
AMD EPYC 9354 | 2,538 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon w7-3565X | AMD EPYC 9354 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 335W | 280W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.67 | 0.56 |
Running cost per day | $0.168 | $0.140 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 244.6 | 204.4 |
Running cost per year | $61.14 | $51.10 |