Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while AMD EPYC 9375F is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 45% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E5-4655 v4 @ 2.50GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 3 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon E5-4655 v4 @ 2.50GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 9375F | |
×Intel Xeon E5-4655 v4 @ 2.50GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9375F | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.2 GHz | Up to 4.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 30MB | L1: 2,560KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 135W | 320W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $24.64 | $58.40 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2024 | Q1 2025 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 2.4 | 17.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1952(-45.4%) | 3575(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 10912(-88.2%) | 92190(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-4655 v4 @ 2.50GHz | 10,912 | |
AMD EPYC 9375F | 92,190 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-4655 v4 @ 2.50GHz | 2.4 | |
AMD EPYC 9375F | 17.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-4655 v4 @ 2.50GHz | 1,952 | |
AMD EPYC 9375F | 3,575 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-4655 v4 @ 2.50GHz | AMD EPYC 9375F | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 135W | 320W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.27 | 0.64 |
Running cost per day | $0.068 | $0.160 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 98.6 | 233.6 |
Running cost per year | $24.64 | $58.40 |