Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, but Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is around -46% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is around -7% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core Ultra 9 285T uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1409 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | ×Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$589.45 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1851 | FCLGA1851 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.7 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.7 GHz | Up to 5.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 24) | 24 (Threads: 24) | |
Cache | L1: 2,432KB, L2: 40.0MB, L3: 36MB | L1: 2,688KB, L2: 36.0MB, L3: 36MB | |
TDP | 125W | 35W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $6.39 | |
Other | Intel Graphics | Intel Graphics, Intel AI Boost | |
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2024 | Q1 2025 | |
# of Samples | 1394 | 15 | |
CPU Value | 115.4 | 67.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 5102(0.0%) | 4735(-7.2%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 68005(0.0%) | 36782(-45.9%) |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 68,005 | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | 36,782 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 115.4 | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | 67.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 5,102 | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | 4,735 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 35W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |