Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is newer than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X also around 7% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 44% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1300 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | ×AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $379.99 - BUY | $1070 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1851 | sTRX4 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.5 GHz | Up to 4.5 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 20 (Threads: 20) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 36.0MB, L3: 30MB | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 125W | 280W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $51.10 | |
Other | Intel Graphics | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2024 | Q4 2019 | |
# of Samples | 268 | 1032 | |
CPU Value | 154.8 | 51.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 4793(0.0%) | 2682(-44.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 58808(0.0%) | 54865(-6.7%) |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | 58,808 | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 54,865 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | 154.8 | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 51.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | 4,793 | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 2,682 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 280W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |