Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while AMD EPYC 9845 is around 45% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 23% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9845 uses around 11% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 12 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD EPYC 9845 | |
2: Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | |
×AMD EPYC 9845 | ×Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP5 | FCLGA4677 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.7 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 160 (Threads: 320) | 64 (Threads: 128) | |
Cache | L1: 10,160KB, L2: 127.0MB, L3: 320MB | L1: 5,120KB, L2: 128.0MB, L3: 320MB | |
TDP | 390W | 350W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $71.18 | $63.87 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2024 | Q3 2024 | |
# of Samples | 11 | 1 | |
CPU Value | 11.3 | 7.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 3144(0.0%) | 2411(-23.3%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 152985(0.0%) | 84013(-45.1%) |
AMD EPYC 9845 | 152,985 | |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | 84,013 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 9845 | 11.3 | |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | 7.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 9845 | 3,144 | |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | 2,411 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 9845 | Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 390W | 350W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.78 | 0.70 |
Running cost per day | $0.195 | $0.175 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 284.7 | 255.5 |
Running cost per year | $71.17 | $63.87 |