Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.40GHz is around 8% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing but the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 4 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.40GHz | ×Intel Xeon Gold 5320H @ 2.40GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | FCLGA4189 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 4.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 20 (Threads: 40) | |
Cache | NA2 | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 28MB | |
TDP | 165W | 150W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $30.11 | $27.38 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2025 | Q3 2024 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 20.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2320(-4.4%) | 2428(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 34592(0.0%) | 31718(-8.3%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.40GHz | 34,592 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 5320H @ 2.40GHz | 31,718 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.40GHz | NA | |
Intel Xeon Gold 5320H @ 2.40GHz | 20.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.40GHz | 2,320 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 5320H @ 2.40GHz | 2,428 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.40GHz | Intel Xeon Gold 5320H @ 2.40GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 165W | 150W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |