Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while Intel Xeon w7-2595X is around 48% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 38% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon w7-2595X uses around 41% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 3 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.40GHz | ×Intel Xeon w7-2595X | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | FCLGA4677 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 4.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 26 (Threads: 52) | |
Cache | NA2 | L1: 2,080KB, L2: 52.0MB, L3: 49MB | |
TDP | 165W | 250W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $30.11 | $45.63 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2025 | Q1 2025 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 1 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 32.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2320(-37.8%) | 3728(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 34592(-47.8%) | 66235(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.40GHz | 34,592 | |
Intel Xeon w7-2595X | 66,235 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.40GHz | NA | |
Intel Xeon w7-2595X | 32.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.40GHz | 2,320 | |
Intel Xeon w7-2595X | 3,728 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.40GHz | Intel Xeon w7-2595X | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 165W | 250W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |