Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is newer than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X also around 25% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing and is significantly faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core Ultra 9 285T uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1509 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | ×AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1851 | sTR4 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 1.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.4 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 24) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 2,688KB, L2: 36.0MB, L3: 36MB | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 32MB | |
TDP | 35W | 180W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $32.85 | |
Other | Intel Graphics, Intel AI Boost | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2025 | Q3 2017 | |
# of Samples | 15 | 1494 | |
CPU Value | 67.0 | 44.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 4735(0.0%) | 2278(-51.9%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 36782(0.0%) | 27667(-24.8%) |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | 36,782 | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 27,667 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | 67.0 | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 44.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | 4,735 | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 2,278 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 180W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |