Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz is newer than Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz, while Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz is around 35% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 22% faster in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 2509 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz | ×Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$41 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA1155 | FCLGA1155 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 4) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 3MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | |
TDP | 55W | 55W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $10.04 | $10.04 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2012 | Q4 2012 | |
# of Samples | 1903 | 606 | |
CPU Value | 57.1 | 22.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1783(0.0%) | 1382(-22.5%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2341(0.0%) | 1532(-34.5%) |
Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz | 2,341 | |
Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | 1,532 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz | 57.1 | |
Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | 22.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz | 1,783 | |
Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | 1,382 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz | Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 55W | 55W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |