Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz is newer than Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz also around 45% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz is around 9% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz uses around 47% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1727 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz | |
2: Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz | |
×Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz | ×Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA775 | LGA775 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 65W | 105W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $19.16 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2008 | Q4 2008 | |
# of Samples | 741 | 986 | |
CPU Value | 22.5 | 16.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 11883(0.0%) | 1077(-9.4%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1154(-45.0%) | 2099(0.0%) |
Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz | 1,154 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz | 2,099 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz | 22.5 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz | 16.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz | 1,188 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz | 1,077 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz | Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 105W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.13 | 0.21 |
Running cost per day | $0.033 | $0.052 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 47.5 | 76.6 |
Running cost per year | $11.86 | $19.16 |