Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i5-11600K @ 3.90GHz is newer than Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing and is significantly faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core i5-11600K @ 3.90GHz uses around 27% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 4207 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz | ×Intel Core i5-11600K @ 3.90GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$160 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA775 | FCLGA1200 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 4.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 6 (Threads: 12) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 480KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 12MB | |
TDP | 95W | 125W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $22.81 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2008 | Q2 2021 | |
# of Samples | 2382 | 1825 | |
CPU Value | 27.8 | 122.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 995(-70.3%) | 3347(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1781(-90.9%) | 19556(0.0%) |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz | 1,781 | |
Intel Core i5-11600K @ 3.90GHz | 19,556 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz | 27.8 | |
Intel Core i5-11600K @ 3.90GHz | 122.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz | 995 | |
Intel Core i5-11600K @ 3.90GHz | 3,347 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz | Intel Core i5-11600K @ 3.90GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 95W | 125W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |