Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD E1-6050J APU is newer than Intel Core i3-3110M @ 2.40GHz, while Intel Core i3-3110M @ 2.40GHz is around 16% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 37% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD E1-6050J APU uses substantially less power.The values below were tabulated from a combined 3195 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core i3-3110M @ 2.40GHz | ×AMD E1-6050J APU | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | BGA1023 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | NA2 | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 4) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 3MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 2.0MB, | |
TDP | 35W | 10W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $1.83 | |
Other | Radeon R2 Graphics | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2012 | Q1 2016 | |
# of Samples | 3193 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 23.5 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1240(0.0%) | 787(-36.5%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1646(0.0%) | 1385(-15.8%) |
Intel Core i3-3110M @ 2.40GHz | 1,646 | |
AMD E1-6050J APU | 1,385 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i3-3110M @ 2.40GHz | 23.5 | |
AMD E1-6050J APU | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i3-3110M @ 2.40GHz | 1,240 | |
AMD E1-6050J APU | 787 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i3-3110M @ 2.40GHz | AMD E1-6050J APU | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 10W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |