Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon 3040 @ 1.86GHz is newer than AMD Opteron 1214, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, AMD Opteron 1214 is around 25% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Opteron 1214 uses around 45% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 12 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon 3040 @ 1.86GHz | |
2: AMD Opteron 1214 | |
×Intel Xeon 3040 @ 1.86GHz | ×AMD Opteron 1214 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA775 | AM2 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 1.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | |
TDP | 65W | 103W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $18.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2009 | Q4 2009 | |
# of Samples | 8 | 4 | |
CPU Value | 31.5 | 8.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 621(-25.2%) | 8313(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 790(0.0%) | 763(-3.3%) |
Intel Xeon 3040 @ 1.86GHz | 790 | |
AMD Opteron 1214 | 763 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon 3040 @ 1.86GHz | 31.5 | |
AMD Opteron 1214 | 8.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon 3040 @ 1.86GHz | 621 | |
AMD Opteron 1214 | 831 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon 3040 @ 1.86GHz | AMD Opteron 1214 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 103W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.13 | 0.21 |
Running cost per day | $0.033 | $0.051 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 47.5 | 75.2 |
Running cost per year | $11.86 | $18.80 |