Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron G465 @ 1.90GHz is newer than AMD FX-6100 Six-Core, while AMD FX-6100 Six-Core is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 38% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron G465 @ 1.90GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 3420 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Celeron G465 @ 1.90GHz | |
2: AMD FX-6100 Six-Core | |
×Intel Celeron G465 @ 1.90GHz | ×AMD FX-6100 Six-Core | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA1155 | AM3+ | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 1.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 1 (Threads: 2) | 6 (in 3 physical modules) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, | L1: 480KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 35W | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $17.34 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2012 | Q4 2011 | |
# of Samples | 26 | 3394 | |
CPU Value | 14.8 | 83.9 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 8193(-37.9%) | 1318(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 548(-85.2%) | 3694(0.0%) |
Intel Celeron G465 @ 1.90GHz | 548 | |
AMD FX-6100 Six-Core | 3,694 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G465 @ 1.90GHz | 14.8 | |
AMD FX-6100 Six-Core | 83.9 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G465 @ 1.90GHz | 819 | |
AMD FX-6100 Six-Core | 1,318 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G465 @ 1.90GHz | AMD FX-6100 Six-Core | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.07 | 0.19 |
Running cost per day | $0.018 | $0.048 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 25.6 | 69.3 |
Running cost per year | $6.39 | $17.34 |