Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i9-8950HK @ 2.90GHz is newer than VIA Eden 1000MHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing and is significantly faster in single-thread testing. However, VIA Eden 1000MHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1227 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×VIA Eden 1000MHz | ×Intel Core i9-8950HK @ 2.90GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NanoBGA2 | FCBGA1440 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 1.0 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 4.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 1 (Threads: 1) | 6 (Threads: 12) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.1MB, | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 12MB | |
TDP | 5W | 45W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $0.91 | $8.21 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2017 | Q2 2018 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 1226 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 17.9 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 833(-96.6%) | 2418(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 80(-99.2%) | 10408(0.0%) |
VIA Eden 1000MHz | 80 | |
Intel Core i9-8950HK @ 2.90GHz | 10,408 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
VIA Eden 1000MHz | NA | |
Intel Core i9-8950HK @ 2.90GHz | 17.9 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
VIA Eden 1000MHz | 83 | |
Intel Core i9-8950HK @ 2.90GHz | 2,418 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
VIA Eden 1000MHz | Intel Core i9-8950HK @ 2.90GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 5W | 45W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |