Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz is newer than AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-70, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz uses around 12% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 115 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-70 | |
2: Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz | |
×AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-70 | ×Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | S1 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 31W | 35W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $5.66 | $6.39 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2008 | Q1 2009 | |
# of Samples | 36 | 79 | |
CPU Value | 22.5 | 27.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 548(-5.7%) | 5813(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 561(0.0%) | 542(-3.5%) |
AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-70 | 561 | |
Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz | 542 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-70 | 22.5 | |
Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz | 27.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-70 | 548 | |
Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz | 581 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-70 | Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 31W | 35W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.06 | 0.07 |
Running cost per day | $0.015 | $0.018 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 22.6 | 25.6 |
Running cost per year | $5.66 | $6.39 |