Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core is newer than AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-75 also around 5% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 45% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-75 uses around 33% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 590 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-75 | |
2: AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core | |
×AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-75 | ×AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$19.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | S1 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, | |
TDP | 35W | 25W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $4.56 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2009 | Q2 2010 | |
# of Samples | 14 | 576 | |
CPU Value | 30.7 | 34.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 444(-45.2%) | 8113(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 659(-5.1%) | 694(0.0%) |
AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-75 | 659 | |
AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core | 694 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-75 | 30.7 | |
AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core | 34.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-75 | 444 | |
AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core | 811 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-75 | AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 25W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.07 | 0.05 |
Running cost per day | $0.018 | $0.013 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 25.6 | 18.3 |
Running cost per year | $6.39 | $4.56 |