Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron M 410 @ 1.46GHz is newer than Intel Celeron M 1.00GHz, while Intel Celeron M 1.00GHz is around 17% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Celeron M 410 @ 1.46GHz is around 34% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 49 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Celeron M 1.00GHz | |
2: Intel Celeron M 410 @ 1.46GHz | |
×Intel Celeron M 1.00GHz | ×Intel Celeron M 410 @ 1.46GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $13.99 - BUY | Search Online | |
Socket Type | NA2 | PPGA478 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 1.0 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 1 (Threads: 1) | 1 (Threads: 1) | |
Cache | L1: 2KB, L2: 0.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 64KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 27W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $4.93 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2009 | Q1 2009 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 45 | |
CPU Value | 10.7 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1973(-34.5%) | 3013(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 149(0.0%) | 123(-17.5%) |
Intel Celeron M 1.00GHz | 149 | |
Intel Celeron M 410 @ 1.46GHz | 123 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron M 1.00GHz | 10.7 | |
Intel Celeron M 410 @ 1.46GHz | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron M 1.00GHz | 197 | |
Intel Celeron M 410 @ 1.46GHz | 301 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron M 1.00GHz | Intel Celeron M 410 @ 1.46GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 27W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | 0.05 |
Running cost per day | NA | $0.013 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | 19.7 |
Running cost per year | NA | $4.93 |