Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Athlon LE-1640 is newer than AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core TK-55, while AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core TK-55 is around 17% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 20% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Athlon LE-1640 uses around 25% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 163 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core TK-55 | |
2: AMD Athlon LE-1640 | |
×AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core TK-55 | ×AMD Athlon LE-1640 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$89.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | AM2 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 1.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 1 (Threads: 1) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 0.5MB, | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, | |
TDP | 35W | 45W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $8.21 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2008 | Q1 2009 | |
# of Samples | 100 | 63 | |
CPU Value | 7.1 | 4.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 6093(0.0%) | 4893(-19.6%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 518(0.0%) | 430(-17.1%) |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core TK-55 | 518 | |
AMD Athlon LE-1640 | 430 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core TK-55 | 7.1 | |
AMD Athlon LE-1640 | 4.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core TK-55 | 609 | |
AMD Athlon LE-1640 | 489 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core TK-55 | AMD Athlon LE-1640 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 45W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.07 | 0.09 |
Running cost per day | $0.018 | $0.022 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 25.6 | 32.9 |
Running cost per year | $6.39 | $8.21 |